Update 14 Dec: See comments, Ion Torrent Suite v2 should be coming to GitHub in January under the GPL v2 - that counts as open in my book :)
Update 23 Jan: As planned, the Ion Torrent Suite is on GitHub under the GPL v2. Nice!
If you go to the IonTorrent website, there is is a bright orange top level tab "Community", which now (as of some time in the last few months) has an encouraging link "Download Sample Data" and "Download Source Code" which take you off-site to some 3rd party domain. Quite why IonTorrent are not hosting this under IonTorrent.com puzzles me, I don't know or care who Jive Software are, but why give them free advertising and handicap search engines?
|The not-open-really Ion Torrent Community, screenshot taken 12 Dec 2011.|
So, despite those encouraging links on the main website, the "Community" pages don't appear to have any public datasets or source code.
If you want to see more, you have to register with the site, give them your email address, and agree to a non-disclosure agreement (NDA). I declined as a matter of principle. That and the fact I don't have any IonTorrent data that needs analysing yet.
Now the plot thickens, and we move an interesting discussion in the comments Monkol Lek's blog (which is well worth subscribing to this blog if you have an IonTorrent machine or are interested in them), which he described as:
Executive one line summary: I do technical stuff with the Ion Torrent data and like to complain a lot :)
The post Fundamentals of base calling (Prequel) in August 2011 mentioned in passing that Ion Torrent were "making it [the software] open source to members of the Ion Community". That got me interested and I asked for more details via the blog comments - apparently it was under the GPL (GNU General Public License), which was quickly confirmed in a comment from IonTorrent's Mike Lelivelt (Director of Bioinformatics & Software Products Life Technologies):
The source code for Torrent Suite is licensed under a straight GPL v2. [LINK]That's great - if you can get your hands on the source code. When asked why not just post the source on their website, not hidden behind the NDA, (an imposter) Mike jokingly replied (Update: see end of post):
Bah humbug. I encourage everyone not to read them so they won’t have to right to complain about them. [Original imposter's comment now deleted]It gets better though - in reply to my quoting some of the NDA in the Ion Community terms and conditions, (fake) Mike wrote:
Oh you mean *that* strict NDA developer agreement language. That helps us promote open source while not really being too open about the source. We go pretty far to put something up there for you then the lawyers come in and obscure it all. I suggest you buy a PGM and join the community, NDA and all. [Original imposter's comment now deleted]I applaud Mike for openly engaging on a technical blog like this (although it turns out this was an imposter - see end of post), but I think IonTorrent had better have another word with their Lawyers - not just for handicapping IonTorrent's openness drive, but to clarify their advice: As spotted by James Casbon (@casualbon on Twitter), you can't release GPL code under a NDA (Richard Stallman says so, and it is even in the GPL FAQ).
I do hope that this is a temporary glitch and that IonTorrent are in the process of opening up their source code - at least to the point that it can just be downloaded under the GPL v2 and used without any additional requirements. They would then have a better claim to be democratising DNA sequencing, compared to the closed-source black box software provided by some of their rivals.
In IonTorrent's shoes I would also aim to release lots of sample data with no strings attached (public domain or CC0 would be fine). Why? To make it as easy as possible for scientists and programs around the world to test their software with IonTorrent's data, and thus support it well. That would be a key factor for selling their machines.
If they don't do it, other people will - but IonTorrent won't get the brownie points. Consider the high profile Open-Source genomic analysis of shiga-toxin-producing E. coli O104:H4 paper in the NEJM about the 2011 E. coli outbreak in Germany, which was based on the BGI releasing raw IonTorrent data to the world, then assembled with MIRA 3 and annotated by volunteers (see Nick Loman's original blog post, EHEC Genome Assembly, and the EHEC wiki). I note this paper features prominently on the IonTorrent website as some good publicity.
So, is IonTorrent open or not? I'm still waiting to find out...
Update 13 Dec: As per the second comment below, and confirmed by email, those quotes about the NDA were from a Mike Lelivelt imposter. Not knowing him personally, the imposter presented a believable if slightly outrageous director, and that probably coloured the tone of my blog post. My apologies to the real Mike for being taken in - but I stand by my view that as long as IonTorrent hide their code and sample data behind a NDA, they are wasting the chance to demonstrate real openness. For example, Roche 454 have an access agreement to see the "Newbler" source code, but because it isn't open I still regard their code as a black box. I hope IonTorrent will take the small step of making their software suite freely downloadable under the GPL without the NDA.
Update 14 Dec: As per the fourth comment, Ion Torrent Suite v2 should be coming to GitHub in January under the GPL v2 - that counts as open in my book :)
Update 15 Dec: Signs of progress, look at this new screenshot from the Ion Torrent Community Intro where the "Not authorised to view the specified document" text has been replaced with links - which sadly goes to a login page:
|Ion Torrent Community Intro, screenshot taken 15 Dec 2011|